<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcasts of our presentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cjritter.com/2009/11/06/podcasts-of-our-presentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cjritter.com/2009/11/06/podcasts-of-our-presentation/</link>
	<description>videogames. rhetoric. culture. play.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:58:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Annie</title>
		<link>http://www.cjritter.com/2009/11/06/podcasts-of-our-presentation/comment-page-1/#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cjritter.com/?p=528#comment-964</guid>
		<description>It was a very different talk than your American Studies one, kind of like a part 1 (the one you recently gave) and a part 2 (where you showed people a close reading of a specific game).  I think that the most interesting parts were your discussions of representations and how they are connected to creators, consumers, and academics.  I&#039;m still not sure if I completely grasp procedural rhetoric, but I definitely think you both did a nice job convincing skeptics that games are complex and can be &quot;read.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a very different talk than your American Studies one, kind of like a part 1 (the one you recently gave) and a part 2 (where you showed people a close reading of a specific game).  I think that the most interesting parts were your discussions of representations and how they are connected to creators, consumers, and academics.  I&#8217;m still not sure if I completely grasp procedural rhetoric, but I definitely think you both did a nice job convincing skeptics that games are complex and can be &#8220;read.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
